Kathi raning rawat v state of saurashtra
WebbKathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra, AIR 1952 SC 123. E.P v. State of Tamilnadu AIR 1974 SC 555. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597. R.D v. International Airport Authority of India , AIR 1979 SC 1628. Air India v. Nergesh Mirza, AIR 1981 SC 1829. Javed v. State of Harayana, AIR 2003 SC 3057. National Legal … WebbISSUE: Whether the provisions of ordinance, contravention with the provisions laid down in Article 14 of the Constitution of India? RULE: Claim under article 14 is dealt with the …
Kathi raning rawat v state of saurashtra
Did you know?
WebbHowever, at this juncture, it is important to clarify that each form of classification doesn’t constitute discrimination. In the case of Kathi Raning Rawat v. the State of Saurashtra, the validity of special courts were challenged. WebbKathi Raning Rawat v/s State of Saurashtra Decided On, 27 February 1952 At, Supreme Court of India By, HON'BLE JUSTICE M. PATANJALI SHASTRI (CJI) By, HON'BLE …
WebbUntitled - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Webb28 aug. 2024 · Kathi Raning Rawat v. The State of Saurashtra 5, It was held that the prelude to the Ordinance which alluded to “the need to accommodate open wellbeing, support of open request and the conservation of harmony and serenity in the State of Saurashtra” along with the sworn statement documented by the State Government …
WebbKathi Raning Rawat Vs. The State of Saurashtra [1952] INSC 11 (27 February 1952) 1952 Latest Caselaw 11 SC Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 11 SC Judgement Date : 27 Feb 1952 Download as PDF Constitution of India CrPC Section 5. Saving Delhi Laws Act, 1912 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) IPC Section 34. WebbKathi Raning Rawat vs The State Of Saurashtra on 27 February, 1952 Pannalal Binjraj And Another vs The Union Of India And Others. (And ... on 21 December, 1956 Warning on Translation User Queries special courts jury special courts act reasonable classification warrant case equality before law anwar ali criminal trial anwar article 14 constitution
WebbIn the case of Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra5, it was held that: “32- The legislature is given the utmost latitude in making the classification and it is only when there is a palpable abuse of power and the differences made haveno rational relation to the objectives of the regulation that necessity of judicial interference arises.” gsl251grebs motherboardWebbKathi Ranning Rawat v State of Saurashtra - YouTube AboutPressCopyrightContact usCreatorsAdvertiseDevelopersTermsPrivacyPolicy & SafetyHow YouTube worksTest … gsl 2023 tournamentsWebb8 Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra, A.I.R. 1952 S.C. 123, 125-126. And see Krishan Chander Nayar v. Chairman, Central Tractor Organisation, A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 602. 786 International and Comparative Law Quarterly [VoL. 11 It is not true that the Oxford Dictionary governs the meaning of financed research post at universityWebbThe Rajpramukh on April 5, 1948, promulgated another Ordinance No. XII of 1948 which extended to the State of Saurashtra the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure … gsl25jfpabs motherboardhttp://lawfaculty.du.ac.in/files/course_material/Old_Course_Material/Content%20LB-401%20Constitutional%20Law-II%20%20Material%202424.pdf gsl.23rd praws.gmnscouts.org.ukWebbKathi Raning Rawat vs The State Of Saurashtra on 27 February, 1952 Showing the contexts in which collective fine appears in the document Change context size Current … gsl25jftabs control boardKathi Raning Rawat vs The State Of Saurashtra on 27 February, 1952. Equivalent citations: 1952 AIR 123, 1952 SCR 435. Author: M P Sastri. Bench: Sastri, M. Patanjali (Cj), Fazal Ali, Saiyid, Mahajan, Mehr Chand, Mukherjea, B.K., Aiyar, N.C. & Bose, Vivian & Das, S.R. PETITIONER:KATHI RANING RAWATVs. finance dscg 2022